Thriving Church
![]()
![]()
A
Thriving "little" church in oregon that doesn't know any Better
by Keith Drury
Last Sunday, while stuck on the coast of
Oregon, I attended a wonderful Presbyterian church. If the main line church is
dead, then somebody forgot to tell these people. It was a thriving congregation
and I marveled at the service.
As I arrived the parking lot was full, with cars jammed in all sorts of ways. I
parked on the grass. Organized 149 years ago, this historic church gave off the
aroma of 'permanence' as if to say, 'We've been through the civil war, both
world wars, the depression, Viet Nam, and Watergate, -- we'll survive anything
else coming our way. Evangelical churches seldom possess this sense of
permanence. The worship atmosphere was charged with expectation and meaning. I
worshipped.
I wasn't sure where this was going when the music started. Singing was led by a
thirty-fiveish woman sprouting spiked jet black hair leaping from her head like
an erupting volcano. I figured she probably belonged to the Sierra club, ate
granola and her Volvo displayed a 'Save the Whales" bumper sticker. I groaned.
But, she got the people singing. It sounded like a thousand voices filling the
church. She scolded the people a bit for 'wanting only familiar Christmas
songs,' warning that they'd be singing mostly old songs, not 'the popular songs
of the last 100 years.' (?!)
Speaking of hymns, we sang five full hymns, two before preaching and three
afterward, none of them back to back. People sang heartily, accompanied by what
looked like a 100 year old organ (played by a lady only a bit younger). The
music 'filled' the room encouraging me to sing louder myself.
The boomerish pastor was shinny bald on top, but compensated with a bonus crop
of hair around the edges and over his ears. He had earned a doctorate from some
university in Germany I can neither pronounce nor spell. His message was about
the only source of hope for today: the Word of God and they acted like it. The
order of service featured a long Old Testament reading, a responsive Psalm, a
New Testament reading plus a lengthy Gospel reading. (I wonder why evangelical
churches who prattle the most about the authority of Scripture act the least
like it really is important to a worship service?)
Right before the offering, the pastor came down among the people and asked for
prayer requests, which turned out to be sort of like 'testimonies' covering the
physical needs of the people plus the homeless shelter the church sponsored 'in
town.' He then prayed at a leisurely pace -- for several minutes -- with great
pauses between sentences as if he expected us to fill in the dead space with our
own prayers. The sacrament of holy communion was served with four women
distributing the elements.
The service lasted exactly one hour, which amazed me -- they seemed to do so
much in an hour, yet were not rushed. Following the service we were all invited
to the back of the sanctuary for coffee and heaps of home made cookies and tiny
little sandwiches.
I liked the service. I liked the people. There was a *thriving* atmosphere, as
if they knew what they were about and where they were going. If I were moving
into the community and didn't have a church, I'd sure consider this one.
But what is most shocking about my visit is their size. About half way through
the service I counted (I confess, I'm a recovering Boomer!). How many were
there? Fifty-two. I counted again. Sure enough, fifty-two. The actual church
building only measured 24' X 24' with an 'addition' of about the same size (I
checked the drywall seams). They had only twelve pews. Each looked crammed if it
boasted five people. More than twenty people sat in chairs set up along the
edges, which gave an 'overflow crowd' feel to the service. The cream painted
walls were set off with sparkling white wood trim. There was a single window
facing South -- a simple stained glass one.
What haunted me as I left... no, it outright *irritated* me.. is how this little
church of 52 seemed so successful... so thriving. Didn't they know they were
considered a failure among the church growth gurus? What right did they have to
act so happy, so joyful, so satisfied with their little dinky church of 52? A
church of 52 isn't viable -- haven't they read the same books I have? And
another thing, why would a guy with an earned doctorate from a prestigious
German university act so happy pastoring 52 people? Where'd he get his notions
of success from? Doesn't he know that he'll never be invited to speak at a
ministers' conference to tell others how he did it? Why waste his life away in a
church of 52? What was going on here?
I left church last Sunday wondering what these people had that most evangelical
churches have lost. Evangelicals are always reaching forward for success. Always
striving, never thriving. This sense of *thriving* always seems just around the
corner... when we reach 100, or 300, or 1,000, or after we get our new building.
But it is seldom a present-tense experience. Like drinking seawater, we can't
get enough, and the more we drink, the thirstier we get. Yet, this little
Presbyterian church of fifty-two seemed to focus more on *being* the church,
than *growing* the church. I can't get that little congregation out of my mind.
The have something to teach us all.
What do you think? What gives this sense of *thriving* to a church? What can we
learn from them?
|
By Keith Drury, You are free to transmit, duplicate or distribute this article for non-profit use without permission. You may view Keith Drury's website at Tuesday Columns. |
![]()
This site was last updated on
Thursday May 04, 2006
Thank you for taking the time to visit
our website. If you have any questions or suggestions,
please feel
free to contact me at
PJ@smallChurch.com